Funtumfunefu Denkyemfunefu — The Adinkra symbol of Unity

Most symbols of unity show people in agreement. This one shows two crocodiles fighting over food. They share one stomach. Everything they swallow feeds both of them equally. And they are still fighting. The Akan people saw this and called it not a failure of unity but its most honest image — the one that does not pretend away the difficulty, but shows what unity looks like when it is real.

At a glance

What Funtumfunefu Denkyemfunefu Means

The name combines two proper nouns — Funtumfunefu and Denkyemfunefu — the names given to the two heads of a mythical pair of Siamese crocodiles that share a single stomach. They are two, and they are one. Entirely distinct at the head, entirely common at the body. Everything that enters either of them goes to the same place.

The proverb that accompanies the symbol is precise in a way that matters: Funtumfrafu Denkyemfrafu, wowo yafunu koro nanso wonya biribi a wofom efiri se aduane no den — "Funtumfrafu and Denkyemfrafu share one stomach, yet when they find food they fight over it — because of the sweetness of the food as it passes through." The symbol does not erase the conflict. It names it. The two crocodile heads are genuinely fighting. The struggle is real. The food is sweet and each head wants to be the one that swallows it. And the stomach, which receives everything regardless, is entirely indifferent to the contest above it.

This is what distinguishes Funtumfunefu Denkyemfunefu from simpler unity symbols. It does not depict harmony as the natural state. It depicts a shared destiny that persists despite conflict — and it asks, through the image of the fighting crocodiles, an unsettling question: if you already share everything that matters, why are you still fighting?

"They share one stomach, yet when they find food they fight — because of the sweetness of the food as it passes through."

The Story Behind the Symbol

The Akan peoples of Ghana lived in complex political structures — kingdoms and confederacies in which diverse clans, lineages, and communities had to negotiate common interest across genuine difference. The Asante Confederacy, in particular, was a sophisticated political arrangement in which many distinct groups maintained their identities while remaining bound to a shared constitutional order. This was not a unity of sameness. It was a unity of interdependence — held together not by the erasure of difference but by the recognition of common destiny.

The symbol was carved into the wooden stools used by Akan chiefs and kings — objects of profound constitutional significance in Akan culture, where the stool was not merely a seat but the embodiment of a ruler's authority and the continuity of the lineage they represented. To carve Funtumfunefu Denkyemfunefu into a stool was to inscribe a political philosophy directly into the object of governance: that leadership is exercised on behalf of people who are bound together by a destiny they did not individually choose, and whose conflicts, however real, are secondary to that binding.

The symbol also appeared on adinkra cloth worn at ceremonies that brought together people from different communities — occasions where the question of how to be different and united simultaneously was not abstract but immediate. Wearing the symbol was a declaration of something that the community needed to keep declaring: that whatever we are disputing, our stomachs are one.

Cultural Significance

Among all the Adinkra symbols concerned with community and collective life, Funtumfunefu Denkyemfunefu is the most politically sophisticated. Bese Saka speaks of communal prosperity. Mpatapo speaks of reconciliation after conflict. This symbol speaks of something harder: the permanent condition of difference within unity, and the work required to keep choosing the stomach over the head.

The symbol has been widely adopted in contexts of democratic and civic life across Africa and the diaspora. It appears in the visual identity of Pan-African institutions, in the architecture of public buildings, and in the work of artists and designers engaged with questions of how diverse communities sustain themselves. Its particular genius is that it holds conflict and unity in the same image — it does not tell you that conflict will disappear when you recognise your shared destiny. It tells you that the shared destiny is real regardless of whether the conflict disappears.

For the African diaspora — communities that have had to sustain collective identity across enormous internal diversity of origin, language, religion, and experience — this symbol carries a particular weight. The two crocodile heads are not a problem to be solved. They are the accurate description of a condition that has always been true. The question the symbol poses is not how to become one head. It is how to stop wasting energy on a fight that the stomach has already settled.

Why It Still Matters

The contemporary world is extraordinarily good at producing difference and extraordinarily bad at living with it. Political polarisation, cultural fragmentation, the algorithms that reward the performance of conflict over the work of common interest — the world of the two crocodile heads, scrambling over the sweetness of what passes through, is not a historical curiosity. It is the present.

What Akan philosophy offered in Funtumfunefu Denkyemfunefu was not an instruction to stop having differences or to stop feeling the pull of self-interest. It was something more practical and more demanding: a reminder that the shared stomach already exists, that the outcome of the fight is already determined, and that the energy spent on the contest is not free. Every bite that one head struggles to claim goes to the same place as every bite the other head swallows without contest. The fight costs both of them. The unity was never in question. Only the wisdom to see it.

To wear this symbol is to carry that reminder as a posture toward the people you share a world with — the people who are different from you, who want different things, who swallow life differently. The stomach is still one. The question the Akan elders pressed into cloth and carved into stools is the same question available to anyone who puts this symbol on: knowing that, what exactly are we still fighting about?

Explore related symbols